Taylor Swift’s Reps Reply to Backlash In opposition to Personal Jets

CLEVELAND, OHIO - OCTOBER 30: Taylor Swift performs onstage during the 36th Annual Rock & Roll Hall Of Fame Induction Ceremony at Rocket Mortgage Fieldhouse on October 30, 2021 in Cleveland, Ohio. (Photo by Kevin Kane/Getty Images for The Rock and Roll Hall of Fame )

Taylor Swift got here underneath hearth when a advertising and marketing agency known as Yard printed an inventory rating celebrities based mostly on their private-jet utilization in a July 29 report. Utilizing knowledge from a Twitter account known as Movie star Jets that borrows insights from a reservoir of flight info known as ADS-B Alternate, the outlet discovered that Swift had used her non-public jet greater than some other celeb in 2022, taking a complete of 170 flights to date this 12 months. Per the examine, Swift’s aircraft spent 22,923 minutes within the air since January, with a median flight time of 80 minutes, which is roughly 1,185 occasions the variety of carbon emissions of a median particular person.

Shortly after the record was unveiled, Swift’s reps provided an evidence for her seemingly excessive utilization. “Taylor’s jet is loaned out recurrently to different people,” they stated in a press release to At this time shared on July 30. “To attribute most or all of those journeys to her is blatantly incorrect.”

The entire private-jet dialogue started when Kylie Jenner was criticized for exhibiting off her and Travis Scott’s non-public jets on Instagram and taking a flight that reportedly lasted solely 17 minutes, per Movie star Jets. Followers rapidly accused her of “flexing her absolute disregard for the planet” on social media.

However the knowledge quickly revealed that Jenner is much from the worst offender when it comes to private-jet emissions — that honor belongs to Swift by a landslide. Following her was Floyd Mayweather, then JAY-Z, A-Rod, and Blake Shelton. Steven Spielberg, Kim Kardashian, Mark Wahlberg, and Oprah Winfrey additionally made the record. Jenner herself didn’t make the record, although Scott did, rating tenth.

In fact, people’ carbon footprints — even when extraordinarily massive — aren’t the principle drivers of the local weather disaster. That title belongs to fossil-fuel firms, the highest 100 of which produce over 71 % of world carbon emissions, that means that the outrage being projected at celebrities could be higher directed in the direction of these companies. Nonetheless, the extremely wealthy’s carbon emissions do make a distinction. A 2020 Oxfam report discovered that the richest one % of individuals on the earth alone produce twice as many carbon emissions because the poorest 50 % of individuals on Earth do all collectively. In the meantime, the individuals who produce the least carbon emissions face the worst results of local weather change general.

In brief, whereas fossil-fuel companies — not Jenner or Swift — are primarily responsible for the local weather disaster, it would not damage if the celebrities left their jets on the bottom every now and then.

Add Comment